I am not sure if you remember my detailed elaborations on the effects of sexual intercourse on exercise performance from May 30, 2012 [see
"Will Sex Before a Competition Hamper Your Performance?" |
more], but if you don't I'd suggest you start out with this
SuppVersity Classic before you devote yourself to Rock'n'Roll by reading up on that in my article
"Acoustic Gear" [
read more] and return here for the missing third part of the triumvirate:
Drugs!Drug #1: Caffeine - From your coffee mug to the doping listI am actually 100% confident that 99% of you have already trained "on drugs". Most of you probably do it regularly. Either with caffeine, about which Tony Chou reported in a 1992 paper that it is consumed on a daily basis by ~90% of the adult population (Chou. 1992). With average amounts of "only" 200 mg or 2.4 mg/kg/day (about 2 cups of coffee).
Why are you laughing? Caffeine was on the WADA's list of banned substances from 1962 to 1972 and again from 1984 to 2003. Whether the average coffee consumer will ever achieve concentrations of 12 μg/ml+ in the urine and thus fail a doping test is obviously a whole different question, but during the second banned period from 1984-2003, a whole host of athletes passed the magic 12 µg/ml line and were tested positive for caffeine. The sanctions ranged from warnings up to
2 year suspensions (maximum penalty, usually only 2–6 months; cf. Pesta. 2013).
In view of the fact that its ergogenic effects are so well established as with hardly any other substance, I will stick to a very brief overview of the surprising benefits the world's "drug" #1 will have on preformance:
- Antagonism of adenosine ➲ analgesic effects (reduced perception of pain; Derry. 2012)
- Increased fatty acid oxidation ➲ higher endurance (Spriet. 1992)
- Decreased respiratory ration ➲ increased use of fat, decreased use of glycogen (Rush. 2001)
- Increases cAMP by inhibiting phospodiesterase ➲ increase lipolysis = more fuel (Umemur. 2006)
- Activation of protein kinase A ➲ s. above + increase in gluconeogenesis = more fuel (Graham. 2001)
- Increases glycogen storage ➲ faster recovery (Pedersen. 2008; learn more)
- Modulation of muscular calciusm flux ➲ increase contractile forces (Tarnopolsky. 2000)
In view of it's various beneficial health effects and the insufficient evidence of significant side-effects, when it is consumed in moderation, exercise performance should thus not be a reason to give up drinking coffee (and as you remember, contrary to the claims of certain "fad brands" the same is true for
mycotoxins, as well).
Drug #2: Alcohol - From the track to the bar and into the gutterWhile caffeine made it from everyone's coffee mug onto the WADA list of prohibited substances for all sports, alcohol is prohibited in-competition only and only in the following sports: aeronautic, archery, auto mobile, karate, motorcycling and powerboating (until 2010, modern pentathlon was also included in this list; Pesta. 2013).
Alcohol is a killer: According to WHO, morbidity attributable to alcohol in countries with an established market economy (10.3% of disability adjusted life years) comes second only to that of tobacco (11.7%; Murray. 1997). According to a very recent study by published in the scientific journal Addiction by the Pan American Health Organization, a branch of the World Health Organization alcohol was a 'necessary' cause of death (i.e., death would not have occurred in the absence of alcohol consumption) in an average of 79,456 cases per year in 16 North and Latin American countries (Gawryszewski. 2014).
In view of its effects on exercise performance and the generally reckless approach to the #2 on the list of the most diligent killers among all, not just the freely available drugs the decision of the World Anti Doping Association appears not reasonable, but at least consequent.
For many cyclists at the Tour de France, it was common practice to drink one, two or three glasses, sometimes even a bottle of wine before during and after a race,
but that was in the (good?) old days and its ergogenic effects are certainly questionable. Nevertheless, it took some time until the wine that was often laced with strychnine to help ease the pain and decrease the feeling of fatigue (Fife. 2000) got replaced by EPO, glucocorticoids & co [note: the cyclists also used cocaine or sympathomimetic drugs in order to attenuate the feeling of fatigue associated with such a prolonged exercise; cf. Lucia. 2003].
Now, aside from certain analgesic (=pain reducing) effects, alcohol has little to offer to the average athlete. It may still be the "the most commonly consumed drug in athletic communities" (Pesta. 2013), but in moderation and certainly not for ergogenic purposes.
It has after all been shown to
adversely affects psychomotor skills and
exercise performance. The beneficial reductions in maximal oxygen consumption (~greater muscular efficiency), on the other hand are pathetic, so that the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) rightly recommends that "if an athlete must consume alcohol, that they should refrain from alcohol consumption for at least 48 hours prior to competition." (ACSM)
 |
| Remember the irony in the article " Ultimate Post-Workout Testosterone Booze" [more] - Don't use hard liquor to increase your post-workout testosterone levels by almost 100%, unless figures on a lab report are more important to you than health & performance. |
If you stick to this recommendation even on training days, this will probably eliminate alcohol from your diet altogether or restrict its consumption on the weekend; and that's certainly a good thing. Chronic alcohol abuse will after all
- lead to significant impairments in cardiac and skeletal muscle structure and function in 99% of the cases
- slow down post-exercise recovery, and
- inhibit protein synthesis
There is obviously no debating: Alcohol is a uniformly ergolytic agent, It has significant detrimental effects on exercise performance and it's use
must be minimized not just for performance, but also, and more importantly, for health reasons.
Apropos health! I am sure all of you will be aware that the government of Colorado believes that marijuana should be part of a healthy lifestyle... ah, I mean medical protocol to deal with pain and other issues and decided to legalize the renown preparation of the Cannabis plant that's intended for use as a psychoactive drug and as medicine.
Drug #3: Cannabis, Mariuhana, Pot, WeedAs we have learned from the Tour de France athletes of the past, pain obviously is a major issue for athletes. So, wouldn't it make sense to switch from wine + strichnine to marijuana? Ok, you can't consume it "intra-workout", but maybe before and after the Queen's stage at L’Alpe d’Huez?!
Cannabis is everywhere and has been used for ages: While the legalization of cannabis in Colorado may be innovative, the sue of cannabis and its principal active ingredient, tetrahydrocannabinol (THC is only one of 483 known compounds in the plant, including at least 84 other cannabinoids, such as cannabidiol, cannabinol, tetrahydrocannabivarin, and cannabigerol) is not. It has been used for generations by people all over the world (see table to the left, cf. Chopra. 1969). Whether it is "paleo" or not is yet something I can't tell you for sure ;-)
To answer that question, it may be useful to take a closer look at the structure of THC, which enables it to dock with the cannaboid receptors in the central nervous system (CNS). As Anand et al. point out (Anand. 2009):
- The centrally expressed CB1 receptors trigger the psychotropic effects of marijuana.
- The CB2 receptors in the periphery (spec. the sensory tissue) mediate the analgesic effects.
For the average Tour de France cyclist a selective CB1 receptor modulator (a "SCBRM", so to say ;o) could thus be the drug of choice. In view of the fact that some of the beneficial effects of exercise are also mediated by endogenous cannabinoid receptor antagonists (Hill. 2010), the analgesic effects could potentially be complemented by additional physiological benefits or side effects that are unrelated to the psychotropic effects of marijuana.
If these effects exist is yet probably almost as uncertain as the general usefulness of marijuana as an ergogenic, of which Pesta et al. write that if there were any, they would yet have to be established (Pesta. 2013).
In 1977, already Tashkin et al. (1977) hypothesized that the decrease in exercise performance may be due to itschronotropic effects, which would lead to achievement of maximum heart rate at reduced workloads.It goes without saying that - as long as you dig long enough - you will always find studies with conflicting results. The beneficial effects Tashkin et al. (1975) report in their paper, for example, occured in patients with asthma benefit from the bronchodilating effects of cannabis. For healthy individuals similar benefits are thus more than unlikely.
If there even
is a benefit for pot-heads, it's probably a psychological one that could be brought about by anxiety reducing and euphorigenic effects of cannabis... but let's be honest: Isn't a healthy amount of pre-competition anxiety a necessary prerequisite for world-class performance?
Drug #4: Nicotine - Better smoke tobacco than pot?If alcohol doesn't help and pot is downright bad for you what else could you add to your beloved caffeine? Of course! Cigarettes. I mean,
nicotine and
caffeine that does even sound alike! Plus: Some "experts" say that they synergistically promote weight loss (which is a non-verified hypothesis that is often supported by a single short-term human trial by Jessen et al. (2003) and entails the risk of developing diabetes; cf. Attvall. 1993).
A note on different deliver routes: Both snus and nicotine gums enable nicotine to diffuse across the mucous membranes and are taken up by the bloodstream. The effects are yet still not necessarily identical to what we see, when it is inhaled and diffuses across the alveolar membrane - particularly if the source of the nicotine is a carcinogen-packed cigarette.
With its CNS stimulating and dopaminergic effects
3-(1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)pyridine aka
nicotine does at first appear to be a very likely candidate for every pre-workout supplement. Unfortunately, it does also enhance the effect of serotonin and opiate activity and will thus override its own stimulatory with a calming and depressing effect (Silvette. 1962). Against that background it sounds funny that nicotine will still increase the heart rate and blood pressure (Narkiewicz. 1998), as well as cardiac stroke volume and output and coronary blood flow (Bargeron. 1957).
The question is thus: Which effects prevail? The stimulatory or the the sedating effects? The WADA apparently doesn't believe that nicotine doping is worth it.
3-(1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)pyridine is currently on the watch list, but it's neither banned or officially tested for. That does yet not mean that it cannot yield small but significant benefits for endurance athletes (17% improvement in time to exhaustion in Mündel et al. 2006) or sports where dexterity / skills play an important role (improvement in the degree in a real-life motor task, Tucha et al. 2004; positive effect on fine-motor abilities, West et al. 1986; cf. Martin. 2009). None of these effects was observed with cigarettes, though, but with a 7mg nicotine patch, a 2mg nicotine chewing gum and 2mg intranasal nicotine, respectively.
 |
| Figure 1: Cigarette smoking and risk of diabetes among 41 810 men during six years follow up (Rimm. 1995) |
Whether the 17% endurance increase in the Mundal study qualifies as an incentive to "go on the patch" is yet questionable. Nicotine is not just addictive (Stolerman. 1995), going off of it will also trigger declines in motor performance that won't come handy for any athlete (Burtscher. 1994). This as well as the previously cited potential of developing insulin resistance that has been reported for both cigarettes and nicotine gums (Taskinen. 1996; the downside of the Taskinen study is that the increased diabetes risk may be a result of previous cigarette smoking - we can thus not be totally sure that chewing nicotine gums regularly increases your diabetes risk).
 |
| Nicotine + caffeine = heart damage, w/ and without ephedra | more |
Bottom line: If you take a look at the results of this mini-summary, caffeine addiction isn't just the only scientifically proven "ergogenic addiction", it's also the only one without certain (alcohol and pot) and almost certain (nicotine) negative side effects.
If I had to pick my poison I would thus always go for caffeine and ignore alcohol, pot and even nicotine; and that in spite of the fact that the latter
may exert (mainly neurological) benefits in certain sports.
References:
