воскресенье, 3 ноября 2013 г.

GMA. Genetically modified athletes / Генетически модифицированные атлеты


Is Caffeine Good Or Bad? The Risks And Benefits Of Using Caffeine

Is Caffeine Good Or Bad? Risks & Benefits

Is Caffeine Good Or Bad? The Risks And Benefits Of Using Caffeine

 
A complete guide to caffeine: what is is, how it works, its impact on the CNS, risks, benefits, and advice on caffeine dosage and timing recommendations.
This article is part of the Performance Pharmacy Series.
In today’s Starbucks-laden world, it comes as no surprise that caffeine is the most (ab)used over-the-counter stimulant drug. Walk into a gas station and there will likely be an entire aisle dedicated strictly to “energy” drinks: Rockstar, Red Bull, Jolt, etc. Oh and if you missed that aisle, don’t worry because there will be an entire row of “energy shot” products waiting by the register (replace the term energy with caffeine and that’s why it has attained numero uno status on the list of most heavily used stimulant drugs).
Most people aren’t even aware of their caffeine intake; they just adhere to the cultural norms of a morning cup of coffee and succumb to the temptation of fighting off the mid-afternoon “crash” at the office…But then it happens. You wake up, down a triple-shot espresso and don’t feel that usual “pep” that you’re yearning for. Your head starts pounding, you feel lethargic, unmotivated, irritable, and wondering why me?
Well, in a generic sense, you’re no different than a heroine junkie going through withdrawals. You’ve become addicted. For most people, this isn’t a big issue because they just sit at a desk all day and are probably more worried about whose birthday it is in the office so they have an excuse to eat some cake. However, for gym-goers and athletes alike, this can mean disaster for performance.
Now don’t get me wrong I’m not about to demonize caffeine use, but rather I will provide some insight into how this commonplace drug, when implemented properly, can propel your athletic performance to another level.

Caffeine: What It Is and How It Works

Coffee MoleculeAn abbreviated synopsis:
Caffeine (sometimes listed as 1,3,7-trimethylxanthine) is an organic, alkaline substance and a derivative of xanthine. It’s primarily found in tea leaves, coffee beans, guarana, various fruits, and other sources. Its sister homologues--theobromine (aka 3,7-dimethylxanthine) and theophylline (aka 1,3-dimethylxanthine)--are primarily found in kola nut and cacao plant. While caffeine is metabolized in the liver to its sister homologues (albeit not in substantial quantities), which have slightly different effects in humans; we will focus primarily on the physiological effects caffeine provides for athletic performance.
Methylxanthines serve as central nervous system and myocardial (heart) stimulants and are often therapeutically used to treat disorders such as COPD and asthma due to their bronchodilating property. They act as acetylcholinesterase and phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitors; for performance we are mainly concerned with the latter of the two. PDE enzymes serve to break phosphodiester bonds such as those in cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP).
Thus, Inhibition of PDE enzymes prevents (delays) the breakdown of cAMP and cGMP. This is an important mechanism as cAMP and cGMP both serve as second messengers in signal transduction channels. In brief, cAMP and cGMP convey signals from various hormones and other substrates from cell-membrane receptors to intracellular target-molecules. When these signals are amplified by cAMP and cGMP, metabolic processes are more rapid, of which we will look at below.

Brief Primer - What Happens When Your Central Nervous System (CNS) is “Stimulated”

The CNS is composed of the brain and spinal cord in humans and is the pathway for sending and receiving signals between all parts of the body. When the CNS neurons are stimulated and cAMP/cGMP are activated, various bodily functions are sent into “overdrive”; the primary acute effects are:
  • Increased heart rate
  • Vasoconstriction
  • Psychostimulation
  • Increased metabolism
  • Increased urination
Some of these effects are indeed favorable for one’s athletic and physique goals. Many studies have analyzed the cardiovascular and resistance training benefits of caffeine and how it can boost aerobic and anaerobic performance. There appears to be multiple mechanisms for how caffeine acts as an ergogenic aid, such as:
  • Increased exogenous carbohydrate metabolism
  • Increased fatty acid oxidation
  • Increased epinephrine (adrenaline) levels
  • Bronchodilation
  • Decreased muscle interstitial potassium levels
All of these would be desirable benefits for anyone looking to enhance athletic performance and fat loss. In layman’s terms, increased carbohydrate metabolism allows for more efficient utilization of carbohydrates for energy, increased fatty acid oxidation means more of those pesky love handles get used for your workout than your bedroom affairs, ramped up epinephrine levels give you that “cloud nine” feeling and can be a psychological boost, bronchodilation allows for increased oxygen uptake and the reduced muscle interstitial potassium levels are hypothesized to delay fatigue during intense exercise.
Gym Fatigue

The Benefits and Risks of Caffeine Before Hitting the Gym

Caffeine is indeed a worthy addition to one’s pre-workout arsenal, but it ultimately comes down to one’s goals and the circumstances. Recreational and competitive bodybuilders can gain many advantages from propercaffeine use. Taken before a cardio session it will help with fatty acid oxidation, utilization of carbohydrates, mental focus and help you perform at a higher intensity level.
Likewise, these are all desirable for anaerobic performance as well, so caffeine does have its place before hitting the iron. However, certain sport-specific skills require use of precise motor coordination and technique, so for athletes caffeine may hamper performance during a competition; I’d take caution when supplementing caffeine prior to sporting events if you find you’re too jittery or anxious.
So if these are just some of the more positive and pronounced effects of caffeine on athletic performance, you might be asking, “So is caffeine a wonder drug or what?” In short, side-effects from caffeine are numerous and typically dose-dependent (i.e. more caffeine=more pronounced side effects). Such side-effects may include:
  • Dehydration and cramping
  • Headache
  • Nausea/Dizziness
  • Gastrointestinal distress
  • Frequent urination
  • Heart palpitations
  • Increased blood pressure
  • Mental Issues: Irritability, Anxiety, Nervousness, Depression, etc
  • Decreased fine motor skills
  • Increased plasma cortisol levels (though this effect is reduced in healthy individuals
After reading these possible side-effects you may be thinking of starting an anti-caffeine campaign. Before you cast this drug off as doing more harm than good, please consider this old adage: the difference between medicine and poison is in the dose. Like most things in life, moderation is the key and caffeine is no different. The good news is that most of the side-effects are avoidable if one implements caffeine properly.

Implementing Caffeine Into Your Regimen

Caffeine is slightly more complicated than other supplements/drugs in regards to optimizing benefits while reducing side effects. Most studies have found that there is not a significant dose-response relation with caffeine and performance; taking more beyond a certain point does not provide extra benefits for performance and may actually lead to more side effects. The key to caffeine is finding that “certain point” of optimal dosage and intermittently cycling on and off the drug to re-sensitize your CNS receptors and give your adrenal glands some repose.
Dose Amount and Timing
The general dose recommendations for performance enhancement with caffeine are 1-3mg per kg of bodyweight (remember: 1lb=2.2kg). If you’re a 180lb (~81kg) athlete, your dose range will land around 80 to 240mg. This is where one will need to assess their individual goals along with their tolerance to caffeine through trial and error. Caffeine is a relatively quick-acting drug with a short half-life of 4-6 hours (assuming your liver is working properly), so it is generally recommended to ingest your dose about 30-60 minutes before your workout or competition.
If you are taking the caffeine on an empty stomach you could get away with as few as 10-15 minutes as food will slightly decrease absorption rate. If you’re one who likes to eat a decent pre-workout meal, I would aim to take your caffeine in at about one to two hours after your pre-workout meal; main reason being that this should help minimize any acute GI distress between the caffeine and your pre-workout meal.
If you train promptly in the morning before eating a meal, you can also mix caffeine in with some whey/casein protein and/or branched-chain amino acids and ingest that on your way to the gym (if you need the carbohydrates you can toss some Gatorade or other simple carbohydrates in there as well). Again, the timing and dose amounts will need fine tuning once you learn how you respond to caffeine.
Best Source of Caffeine
Since caffeine is a “discreet” chemical, it won’t make much difference whether your caffeine is coming from natural (i.e. coffee, tea, chocolate, etc) or synthetic sources (pill/powder form, energy drinks, supplements, soda, etc). I personally like taking my caffeine in from pre-workout supplements as the one’s I prefer list the caffeine content on the label, commonly in the  form of “caffeine anhydrous”.
For dosage tracking purposes, I tend to prefer supplemental caffeine versus natural sources since the caffeine content can vary from coffee bean to coffee bean and tea leaf to tea leaf. If you’re one of those hippie-all-natural-organic freaks (don’t get offended, dude man!), then by all means enjoy your coffee.
Dealing with Desensitization
Caffeine’s most dreaded attribute is that it becomes addictive and the nominal dose to achieve performance benefits gradually increases as one develops tolerance to the drug. This is why most coffee drinkers can slam a triple-shot espresso and not feel a thing, or they get a short-lived burst of energy and crash 20 minutes later.
If you’ve reached such a point, I strongly encourage you to back off the caffeine either gradually or cold turkey (if you can handle the withdrawal for a few days). The time it takes for one to become “stimmed out” is still up for debate as the variables that come into play are too numerous, so a general recommendation is that for every 8-12 weeks of using caffeine, one should take 1 to 2 weeks off of it (and most any OTC stimulants).
This will be another case of trial and error though, if you find you handle caffeine well and are still obtaining positive effects 4-5 months in a row, then listen to your body and keep dosing caffeine. Contrarily, if you are 3 weeks in with supplementing caffeine and you feel horrible (with or without your daily dose), then it’s time to reconsider your approach and back off for a bit.
The time it takes to re-sensitize yourself to caffeine is going to be influenced by how often you were taking caffeine and how much. If you are only taking it maybe 2-3 times a week with a moderate dose, you could likely keep it in your regimen indefinitely or until you feel a little too draggy without it (i.e. you depend on caffeine to function). If you’re the type that enjoys pushing the limits then you might find yourself becoming tolerant to the effects in just a few short weeks. Overall, you will likely know when it’s time to give the caffeine a break because you will be facing many of the side-effects mentioned earlier; headaches, irritability, lethargy, decreased motivation, etc.
At this point, it’s time to give your CNS and adrenal glands some rest (also consider backing off the training intensity so it coincides with your caffeine cycles).
Is Caffeine For You?
Caffeine, like any supplement or drug, needs to be assessed by the user through research and anecdotal experience to see whether the benefits will help them achieve their goals or not. If you are naturally an energetic individual who doesn’t feel the need for more stimulation through exogenous sources, then I’m of the opinion that you shouldn’t take caffeine just for the sake of it. While I do think most athletic and physique endeavors can be enhanced by caffeine supplementation, the user is ultimately the one who needs to decide if they like the way it affects them.
Some people may not tolerate caffeine well, so if that’s detrimental to performance then it would be asinine to recommend they use it. Also, for younger kids and those who have any withstanding medical conditions, please make sure to consult with your physician prior to beginning use of such drugs. Yes, caffeine can be lethal in sufficiently high doses (>5g), so treat it like any other drug and don’t abuse it.

Caffeine: Bringing it All Together

I’d be doing you a disservice to say that this is the definitive article for anything and everything caffeine, but I hope that this abridged version of how caffeine affects us and our performance in and out of the gym has shed some new light on your understanding of this ever-so-common drug. It was a tough task as my aim with this series is to bring you to where brains meet brawn because damn’t, I love science and I love lifting weights. There are monumental amounts of data on caffeine to sift through and in the world of supplementsthat’s a good thing, because you know it must work (otherwise it wouldn’t be so heavily studied).
In the next installment of the Performance Pharmacy Series we will look at synergistic effects of caffeine and other ingredients, such as those in MTS Nutrition Drop Factor like Synephrine, Forskolin, Yohimbine, etc. and the science behind how they can take your fat burning to a new level!
Whether you’re just a weekend warrior looking for a little pep after a hard week at the office, or a competitive bodybuilder ready to tear into some ass-to-grass squats, caffeine may just have a place in your supplement stash; just use it wisely.

Methylhexaneamine – still a problem in UK sports

 

ShareTweet


One year ago an athelte died while completing the London Marathon. Subsequently she was found to have used the controversial supplement Jack3d, containing methylhexaneamine (DMAA).   Then in August last year the drug was banned from sale, so why are we still seeing positives now?

As I reported in my blog previously the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) ruled in August 2012 that DMAA met the criteria to be classified as a medicinal product.  My understanding of the regulations suggest that the ban is for the promotion and advertisement of the drug without authority.  This was supposed to restrict the availability of DMMA as a supplement.  This did not amount to a legal ban though, as DMAA is not listed as a controlled drug under the Misuse of Drugs Act (1971) or the The Misuse of Drugs Regulations (2001).  This means that while it is illegal to sell DMAA as a dietary supplement it is not illegal to own or take.
On the UK Anti Doping (UKAD) website there are 8 athletes listed as currently suspended (or have been in the last year) having failed tests for DMAA.  Five of the athletes are boxers and three footballers (one each of league, union and association!).  Interestingly the bans imposed range from 5 months to 2 years. This is due to a range of factors, including the intent to enhance performance and attempts to ascertain the contents of the supplement before use.
In Australia DMAA was banned by the Therapeutic Goods Administration in August last year.  The Australian Sports Anti Doping Authority lists three current suspensions from DMAA use, from bodybuilding, rugby league and boxing.  Over in the US, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued similar guidelines to in the UK, where selling DMAA as a dietary substance is an offence.  In the latest listings on the US Anti Doping Agency website there are three suspensions listed from 2012 but non so far from 20113.  the three from 2012 are from cycling (x2) and track and field.  All of the US athletes received a six month ban and are free to compete again.
So why are we still seeing positives in the UK and overseas now?  Some left over stock being sold off is probably one reason.  Maybe it is because the athletes had stocked up themselves and have gradually been working through it.  A quick scout around the internet did lead me to a couple of sites still listing it as available for purchase within the UK, but strictly listed as a research chemical.  I havent trid to purchase any so I am not sure if it would go through or not.  I have enough from my purchases in January (post ‘ban’) for my research.
What does this tell us?  Sports people are still prepared to gamble with supplements that have not had their ingredients thoroughly tested before hand.  This means both tested for illegal drugs and to their safety.  The case of GW1516 tells us that many sports people are quite happy to ignore health warnings.

SARMS – another class of new doping compounds

 

ShareTweet

Cycling has again thrown itself into the spotlight for the wrong reason, doping.  A selective androgen receptor modulator (SARM) called ostarine has been detected in the urine from a cyclist, so what are these SARMS?


In the first of a series of posts I will be looking at new doping compounds and the future of drug testing (first started on the post about GW1516).  I anticipate around 3-4 posts over the next month, with other posts interspersed.

Last week it was announced that the Russian cyclist Nikita Novikov was suspended from competition following the finding of the breakdown products of Ostarine ( hydroxy-ostarine and O-dephenyl-ostarine) in his urine sample.  This is a molecule most will not have heard of and shows again that cyclists are willing to experiment with using new drugs to gain an edge.  In this case however they were not the first to be caught using SARMS, as there have been several previous cases.
Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators (SARMs) have been developed to replace steroids by being more cunning than the steroids can be.  ’Classical’ and/or endogenous steroids may also be known as anabolic androgenic steroids (AAS), the name giving away the properties.  Anabolic is a term which refers to muscle growth, this is one of the desired effects for sports people. Androgenic means the development of male sexual characteristics such as libido, aggression and male pattern hair growth.  Abuse of these drugs has led to many people sufferinghealthwise, with effects such as steroid acne, male pattern baldness and (my favourite word)gynaecomastia (meaning male growth of breast tissues).  The SARMs have been developed to be able to separate out the types effects and produce only the desirable ones (depending on the treatment required).  For sport people this would usually mean the ability to keep or grow muscle mass without the unwanted side effects and without any water retention or fat gain.  They are also developed to be able to be taken orally rather than by injection, which makes them easier drugs to use.
The World Anti Doping Agency recognised their potential for abuse and added them to the prohibited list (under S1 Anabolic Agents) in 2008.  The two main compounds that have been found and are advertised are known asAndarine and Ostarine (as used by the cyclist above).  Andarine (also known as S-4) and Ostarine (known as GTx-024 or MK-2886) are not licensed products as yet.  Ostarine is currently being actively developed by GTx as a treatment for muscle wasting in lung cancer patients. It has been reported that Andarine is no longer a target drug.  No products are currently approved for therapeutic use.
Within a few minutes I was able to find these online and it would not cost a great deal to buy a months supply (well within reach of even amateur sports people).  The ad’s for ostarine claimed to be able to grow skeletal muscle without any hirsuitism or virilisation, no mention of whether it has been found to be safe to use through clinical trials.
Testing methods have been developed and reported for these drugs, with several athletes having tested positive for Andarine.  Due to the chemical structure being very different from classical steroids it may have been believed that they would not be found in doping control samples, but tests have been developed and will continue to be so for any future targets.

These SARMS show a good example of athletes initially being one step ahead of the testers, but now having been caught back up.

AICAR – the get fit without exercise drug

 

ShareTweet

A drug to help lose weight, gain muscle and get fit even without exercise?  This week I will take a look at AICAR…


AICAR – full name  aminoimidazole carboxamide riboside (also with the drug name acadesine) is a drug under development and in clinical trials for various treatments.  The drug is a target for use in various metabolic disorders, obesity and possibly for use in heart operations to prevent damage to tissues.  During animal testing AICAR was evaluated for effects on endurance in mice.  The results showed an improvement of up to 44% in treadmill tests after 4 weeks using the drug without training!  Another study looked at whether GW1516 and AICAR combined was as effective at getting fit compared with GW1516 plus exercise.  The effects were very similar.  This means that gains can be made in fitness using GW1516 and AICAR without training!  This was dubbed ‘exercise in a bottle’ in the media a few years ago. The conclusion is that AICAR makes the body think it has exercised.  This trick is classed as ‘gene doping’ by WADA and AICAR is prohibited in all sports at all times.  This was added to the prohibited list in 2009.
In 2009 the British Medical Journal reported that anti doping authorities in France had analysed contents of cyclists bins and found evidence of the use of AICAR, even though unlicensed (along with another unlicensed product and new variants of EPO).   The head of the French testing authority said he was convinced it was being used.  I have looked on the internet and as with SARMS and GW1516 there are sites that offer it for sale in the UK, but I haven’t tried to order any.
Although there are tests available for AICAR in urine samples – published several years ago – it appears that no athletes have yet been caught using the drug.  The method may not be in routine use as yet due to various difficulties in interpretation.  The drug is naturally present in urine, excreted by the kidneys, even if you have not used the drug.  A paper by Thevis et al (An and Bioan Chem, 2010) looked at the levels found in elite sports persons and suggested a threshold value.  There are various difficulties with this approach such as: the need to have a statistically significant sample for baseline evaluation; to ensure that there are not people who are naturally going to have very high levels (and be tested ‘positive’); to determine whether any illness or disease would increase the urinary excretion; to ensure those using the drug will be tested positive; and hopefully develop a second confirmatory method.  A perfect candidate for this method would be isotope ratio mass spectrometry, which allows differentiation of naturally occurring compounds and pharmaceutical preparations and is currently used to detect testosterone administration.
Long term the effects are not clear, as with GW1516 and SARMS these have not been around long.  For a professional athlete the benefits are clear – improvements in endurance and other fitness measures without increased training.  The ‘coach potato’ may see this as an advantage also.  Exercise does however have a much more beneficial effect on many body organs though.

Thanks for reading – I have one more post on gene doping that will be up next week.  I’ll keep an eye out for other interesting  forensic science stories in the meantime.

Gene doping

 

ShareTweet

  • More Sharing Services  

Gene doping may sound like a future of genetically modified athletes grown in test tubes, but it is a real and current threat to sports.

Gene doping is included on the World Anti Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list, defined as the transfer of nucleic acids and the use of normal or genetically modified cells with the potential to enhance performance.  These possible methods for doping have come from the development of new gene therapy techniques.  Gene therapy involves the insertion of a modified piece of DNA into cells to alter the cell properties.  The DNA can be directly injected to the target area, injected attached to a virus which targets cells required or cells may be removed from the body to have the DNA inserted and the modified cells re-injected.
Recently the EU has approved its first gene therapy, Glybera, to treat people with a genetic condition which inhibits the breakdown of dietary fat.  As gene therapy techniques become more common the potential for doping increases.  The therapy becomes doping when it is used to switch on and off desirable characteristics for sports performance rather than treat disorders.  Targets could include the genes that boost muscle size or strength or produce erythropoietin (EPO).  EPO has been highly abused by athletes for its ability to increase the amount of red cells in the body and hence the oxygen available to muscles during exercise.  Tests for EPO rely on the ability to differentiate between the body’s natural EPO and introduced ‘foreign’ EPO.  This test becomes redundant if all of the EPO produced in the body is natural, but boosted genetically.  However, the new DNA may increase or decrease other proteins in the blood which may be monitored by testing.
Currently there are no direct tests in use for gene doping. The tests are a lot more difficult to develop than for conventional pharmaceuticals.  The genetic code may be tested for alterations or insertions but the test would have to be certain these are not inherited genetic traits but are the result of doping. The alteration of other proteins or gene activity could also be monitored using a ‘biological passport’ approach.  This would track certain proteins over time and would flag significant changes as suspicious.  Another method would be to work with the manufacturers of the therapy and insert a specific DNA tag into the molecule (similar to how genetically modified crops are labelled).  This DNA tag could be tested using blood sample but would only be present with legitimate products whereas many abused drugs are produced illicitly.  WADA have funded projects to develop tests which are said to be promising, but none are approved for use yet.

How to get skinny and get cancer – GW1516

 

ShareTweet


Around this time of year there starts to be a rush of articles in magazines and newspaper supplements on ‘getting skinny for summer’ – this one is a tip that wont appear on those articles – the experimental drug GW1516. This experimental compound now appears to be the drug of choice for cyclists with several positive tests in the past few days.


The background

In 2009 the World Anti Doping Agency (WADA) placed the compound GW1516 (also known as GW501516) on the list of compounds prohibited for use in sport.  The compound was developed by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) for use as a peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-delta agonist.  In lay terms PPAR agonists are compounds that have potential for use in treatment of cardiovascular and metabolism disorders.  For example one compound is being investigated to raise the HDL (‘good cholesterol’) and lower clogging of arteries.  For sports people the main advantage is helping the body burn more fat, thereby getting the athlete very lean, whilst potentially increasing muscular strength.  There were rumours around the use of these substances a few years ago when several cyclists were extremely thin without having lost the muscles required to climb hills quickly.  The use of GW1516 with another banned compound AICAR is reported widely in sports circles as being particularly good at promoting fat loss whilst giving endurance gains.  That sounds perfect for endurance cyclists (and to be fair other endurance sports such as athletics or cross country skiing). The potential for abuse of this was mentioned in a New Scientist article in 2004, whilst the drug was still under investigation by GSK.  The report mentioned that the pill could provide all of the positive muscular effects of exercise without having to get sweaty!
So far so good – but here is the catch.  The trials of GW1516 by GSK were stopped.  According to their own data (found in abstract 895) the use of  GW501516 was seen to promote many different cancer types in various rats cells.  The compound was not developed further for human use.  Even so, you can buy Gw1516 on the internet.  A quick search found various sources of the ‘research chemical’ at costs a professional sports person should be able to afford.  AICAR was also readily available.  Both are marked as ‘not for human consumption’.

Test methods

The published method for testing urine sample for the metabolites of compound GW1516 uses LC-MS.  The metabolites are as the compound to the right but oxygenated on the central sulphur (S) (either one or two O atoms bonded to the S).  The method published by Thevis et al (Anal Bioanal Chem (2010) 396:2479–2491) described the use of LC-MS following enzymic hydrolysis, a method routinely available to the anti doping labs. The paper suggested that there was a likely four day window of detection of the drug after it had last been used.  This is a very good detection window as several drugs of abuse are only detectable for hours after their last use.

Positive tests

Last week it was announced that a Russian cyclist Valerie Kaykov had failed a test for the compound GW1516 – the first time this has been reported.  This was days after WADA had warned athletes of the dangers of using GW1516.  The report mentions the metabolite GW1516 sulfone – this is where the body has added two oxygen atoms to the S atom in the middle (both with double bonds).  Also this week the world cycling governing body UCI announced that four Costa Rican cyclists had tested positive in an event in December (three from the same team).   So has the introduction of the test for this caught out the athletes in question?  Most probably.  This is seen from time to time when a new test is introduced (eg in 2008 several cyclist failed tests for CERA).

There have been several studies over the years that have shown that elite athletes are prepared to gamble with their health by using drugs if they have an increased chance of winning.  This compound does seem to be a huge gamble on their future health.  Obviously I hope that nothing ill comes of any of them but they have taken a big risk.  Cycling is also once again dragged into doping stories which it really needed to avoid in the after mark of the Armstrong and the ongoing Puerto cases.  Let’s hope the rest of the season is quiet and we can see some great victories from true champions!

For more doping related posts please click here!


Thanks for reading – sign up and join the conversation of follow us on Facebook.  
Cheers!